Evidence Hub

Homology modelling and molecular dynamics evaluation of kaempferol and quercetin binding to litchi polyphenol oxidase

Sinha S, Ratan R

2026

Abstract

Abstract Postharvest pericarp browning, caused principally by the enzymatic oxidation of endogenous phenolics by polyphenol oxidase (PPO), is a major factor limiting the shelf life and commercial value of litchi ( Litchi chinensis Sonn.), yet no experimental three-dimensional structure of litchi PPO (LcPPO) is available and its candidate inhibitors have not previously been examined at the molecular level. This work establishes a structure-based, dynamics-tested framework for evaluating candidate anti-browning agents against LcPPO. A validated homology model of the mature enzyme, with its binuclear type-3 copper centre reconstituted and its auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain removed, was used to screen fourteen compounds. The two best-ranked litchi flavonols, kaempferol (− 6.89 kcal/mol) and quercetin (− 6.58 kcal/mol), obtained more favourable scores than the natural substrate (−)-epicatechin and were predicted to occupy the substrate-access channel, with quercetin forming more hydrogen bonds than kaempferol. Independent 20 ns molecular dynamics simulations showed that, although the enzyme remained structurally stable, neither flavonol persistently maintained its docked pose: quercetin reoriented abruptly at approximately 4–5 ns and kaempferol migrated more gradually, behaviour corroborated by RMSD, hydrogen-bond and centre-of-mass analyses, though both ligands remained protein-associated throughout. Classical metal-chelating inhibitors scored weakly, reflecting the inability…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free