Evidence Hub

Preliminary in vitro evaluation of naringin and quercetin for potential bioenhancement of andrographolide using plasma protein binding and hepatic microsomal stability assays

Pisipati P, Paranjpe T, Natu S, Khan A, Salgotra V

2026

Abstract

Several potentially potent anticancer drugs have been identified by in vitro evaluation, such as Andrographolide. These compounds show strong anticancer activity in vitro, but struggle to reach effective concentrations in the bloodstream when taken orally because they dissolve poorly in water or break down rapidly in the body. Bioenhancers, which are compounds that have potential to improve drug stability in the body, offer an alternative solution to overcome this limitation. Naringin and Quercetin have been identified as candidate bioenhancers, and have been hypothesized to potentially slow rapid first pass metabolism of poorly bioavailable drugs. Our work focuses on testing Naringin and Quercetin because they are flavonoids with therapeutic potential, due to their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Data from the hepatic microsomal assays performed on Naringin and Quercetin suggest moderate to proficient periods of stability in the body, with Naringin having 91.86% remaining, while Quercetin had 74.84% remaining. When administered alongside Andrographolide, a drug known to rapidly degrade in the body, Naringin raised its metabolic stability from 38.93% to 80.77% and on the other hand, Quercetin raised Andrographolide metabolic stability from 38.93% to 86.70%. In addition, plasma protein binding assays show the percentage of compounds available at the target site where Naringin was observed to be 49.32% bound and Quercetin found to be 50.14% bound, implying 50.68%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free