Evidence Hub

In silico Evaluation of Vernonia amygdalina-derived Phytochemicals targeting Dual Sites of Penicillin-binding protein 2a

Sunday AO, Mangse G, Okunlola F

2026

Abstract

Abstract Context Penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) drives methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and is a well-established antistaphylococcal drug target. The enzyme has two binding regions: a transpeptidase active site, and an allosteric site roughly 60 Å away that ceftaroline occupies to trigger the conformational change needed for active-site engagement. Six phytochemicals from Vernonia amygdalina (vernolide, vernodalin, hydroxy-vernolide, luteolin, quercetin, apigenin) were assessed for pharmacokinetic suitability and predicted binding at both sites, relative to ceftaroline. All six satisfied Lipinski's rule of five with high predicted gastrointestinal absorption, though luteolin, quercetin, and apigenin came up as likely cytochrome P450 inhibitors. At the allosteric site, quercetin (− 8.9 kcal/mol) and luteolin (− 8.8 kcal/mol) outscored ceftaroline (− 8.2 kcal/mol), and apigenin matched it; at the active site, only quercetin matched ceftaroline (− 6.5 kcal/mol). Re-docking each site's native ligand against its crystal pose gave root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) of 1.820 Å (allosteric) and 1.491 Å (active), both under the usual 2.0 Å reliability cutoff. Quercetin and luteolin stand out as the strongest leads, with the allosteric site emerging as the more promising, mechanistically relevant site of interaction. Methods Physicochemical and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties were predicted with SwissADME. Two Protein Data…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free