Evidence Hub

Integration of Meta-Analysis and Network Pharmacology to Investigate the Pharmacological Mechanisms of Quercetin on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Tan Z, Chen Y, Peng Y, Tang Y, Sun B, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Li O et al.

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is as the most frequently observed histological subtype among primary liver malignancies. While quercetin (QT) shows potential antitumor activity, its preclinical anti-HCC effects and safety (especially in animals) remain unclear. Most existing studies use single methods (e.g., individual animal or in vitro assays), which compromises the reliability of the conclusions. This study's novelty lies in its use of a combined approach-integrating meta-analysis to quantify efficacy and network pharmacology to explore mechanisms, with experimental validation-to address this research gap. This work explores QT's preclinical anti-HCC effects and adverse effects using this integrated approach.

METHODS

We collected literature on the treatment of HCC with QT from January 2000 to August 2024. Nine articles meeting the requirements were included in the current study. Subsequent to this, a meta-analysis was conducted, with further validation via network pharmacology approaches and experimental assays.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis found that QT significantly inhibited HCC growth (reduced tumor volume/weight) and reduced mortality in tumor-bearing mice, with no significant effect on body weight. Network pharmacology identified protein kinase B alpha (AKT1) and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway as potential therapeutic targets. Finally, the aforementioned conclusions were further verified through experimental validation.

CONCLUSION…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free