Evidence Hub

Effects of Quercetin on Cardiac Function in Pressure Overload and Postischemic Cardiac Injury in Rodents: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Siti HN, Jalil J, Asmadi AY, Kamisah Y

Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2022

120 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiac dysfunction can occur as a sequela of a state of prolonged pressure overload and postischemic injury. Flavonoids such as quercetin may be protective against cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to systematically assess the effects of quercetin on cardiac function in pressure overload and postischemia-reperfusion injury in rodents.

METHODS: A systematic search of the literature up to May 2020 was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant published studies on quercetin and cardiac function using standardized criteria. Meta-analyses were performed on animal studies of pressure overload and ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury.

RESULTS: The effects of quercetin on cardiac function in both models were qualitatively reported in 14 studies. The effects of quercetin in four pressure-overload model studies involving 73 rodents and eight I/R-injury model studies involving 120 rodents were quantitatively assessed by meta-analysis. Quercetin improved the overall cardiac function in both pressure overload (n = 4 studies, n = 73 rodents; SMD = - 1.50; 95% CI: - 2.66 to - 0.33; P < 0.05; I2 = 74.05%) and I/R injury (n = 8 studies, n = 120 rodents; SMD = - 1.81; 95% CI: - 3.05 to - 0.56; P < 0.01; I2 = 84.93%) models. The improvement was associated with amelioration in cardiac structure in the pressure-overload model and both systolic and diastolic functioning in the I/R-injury model.

CONCLUSION: The present…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free