Evidence Hub

Evidence Synthesis and Mechanism Analysis of Quercetin Treatment for Atherosclerosis: A Preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chen D, Wang J, Lei Z, Qu L, Zou W

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Atherosclerosis seriously endangers human health. Quercetin has drawn attention for its potential anti-atherosclerotic pharmacological effects. This study aimed to comprehensively assess quercetin's effect and potential mechanism in treating atherosclerosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preclinical studies published before 20 January 2025 were searched for in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. The CAMARADES list was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Stata 12 was applied for overall effect, sensitivity, subgroup, and publication bias analyses. Time-dose interval analyses were conducted to explore how quercetin dose and dosing cycle affect intervention effects. Finally, trial sequential analyses were performed using TSA 0.9 software. A total of 22 studies involving 421 animals were included, with a mean methodological quality score of 7.73/10. Meta-analysis showed that relative to the control group, quercetin reduced aortic plaque area, adjusted lipids (lowered TC, TG, and LDL-C and raised HDL-C), downregulated adhesion factors (e.g., VCAM-1) and pro-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-1β and IL-6), upregulated anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT) while decreasing MDA content, and regulated atherosclerosis-related targets (e.g., LXRα, SIRT1, and mTOR). Subgroup analyses found model establishment time and quercetin administration time affected aortic lesion areas, TC, and TG.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free