Evidence Hub

Neuroprotective Effects of Quercetin in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis

Can C, Hamilçıkan Ş

American journal of perinatology, 2025

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study assesses the neuroprotective potential of quercetin in preclinical models of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) and its role as a possible enhancer of therapeutic hypothermia. Study Design A systematic review of 8 preclinical studies was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with a random-effects meta-analysis. Results Quercetin significantly lowered infarct volume, seizure susceptibility, and inflammation (pooled standardized mean differences [SMD] = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.58; p 30 mg/kg, SMD = 1.65) and intraperitoneal (IP) administration (SMD = 1.42) outperformed lower doses or intravenous (IV) routes (SMD = 0.95). Rat models showed greater benefits (SMD = 1.38) than piglets (SMD = 0.85). Moderate heterogeneity ( I 2 = 45%) was noted, but sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness (SMD = 1.20). Publication bias was minimal ( p = 0.12). Conclusion Quercetin offers notable neuroprotection in neonatal HIBI, with an optimal 40 mg/kg IP dose, suggesting it could complement hypothermia. Limited bioavailability and lack of long-term data call for further research in advanced models. Key Points Quercetin improves outcomes in neonatal HIBI. IP route shows greater efficacy. Higher doses (>30 mg/kg) are more effective. Meta-analysis confirms significant benefit (SMD = 1.29). Bioavailability remains a key translational barrier.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free