Evidence Hub

Effect of Quercetin on inflammatory markers in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies

Sandilya P, Ali A, Bharadwaj R, Adela R

Inflammopharmacology, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with severe complications driven by chronic inflammation, which releases cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. Herbal medicines are gaining importance due to fewer drug-related adverse effects. Quercetin is a flavonoid with potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the impact of Quercetin on inflammatory markers in the animal model of diabetes.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception to February 2025, to identify relevant preclinical studies. Diabetic rodents were included, whereas in vitro, ex vivo, and non-rodent studies were excluded. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model (RE) was performed to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Methodological quality was assessed by sensitivity analyses, publication bias and SYRCLE risk of bias.

RESULT: The included 14 studies in this systematic literature review and meta-analysis indicates that Quercetin treatment significantly reduces the TNF-α (SMD: - 3.40, 95% CI - 5.17 to - 1.63) (P = 0.0002), IL-1β (SMD: - 1.57, 95% CI - 2.65 to - 0.49) (P = 0.004) and IL-6 (SMD: - 4.28, 95% CI - 5.86 to - 2.70) (P < 0.00001). Possible publication bias and moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity (I2) were observed. The results remained unchanged after sensitivity analyses, trim-and-fill…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free