Evidence Hub

Exploring the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacological mechanism of Guizhi Fuling Pill on ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis and network pharmacology analysis

Wang J, Li X, Long J, Gao Q, Pan M, Yang F, Zhang Y

Metabolic brain disease, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

The role of Guizhi Fuling Pill (GZFL) in the treatment of ischemic stroke (IS) is still controversial, and its pharmacological mechanism remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and potential pharmacological mechanisms of GZFL on IS, a comprehensive method integrating meta-analysis, network pharmacology, and molecular docking was employed. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023. Review Manager 5.4.1 software was used for meta-analysis. Active compounds and targets of GZFL were retrieved from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database, Bioinformatics Analysis Tool for Molecular mechANism of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Encyclopaedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Relevant targets of IS were obtained from the DisGeNet, Genecards, and DrugBank databases. GO biological function analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis were performed in the Metascape database. AutoDock Tools and PyMOL software were employed for Molecular docking. The intervention group significantly increased the total effective rate and decreased the NIHSS score. Administration of GZFL also improved the whole blood viscosity (low and high shear rates) and levels of fibrinogen, TNF-α, and IL-6. The key active compounds included quercetin, kaempferol, catechin, and beta-sitosterol, and the core target proteins included SRC, MAPK1, TP53, JUN, RELA, AKT1, and TNF. GO analysis mainly involved inflammation response, cellular response to lipids, and regulation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free