Evidence Hub

Exploring the efficacy and molecular mechanism of Danhong injection comprehensively in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by combining meta-analysis, network pharmacology, and molecular docking methods

Wu X, Li W, Luo Z, Chen Y

Medicine, 2024

896 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Danhong injection, a compound injection of Chinese herbal medicine, has been widely used in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) at present as an adjuvant treatment. However, the clinical efficacy and molecular mechanism of IPF are still unclear. This study will evaluate and explore the clinical efficacy and molecular mechanism of Danhong injection in the treatment of IPF.

METHODS: In meta-analysis, the computer was used to search 8 databases (PubMed, EMbase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP) to collect the RCTs, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 were used for statistical analysis. It has been registered on PROSPERO: CRD42020221096. In network pharmacology, the main chemical components and targets of the chemical components of Danhong injection were obtained in TCMSP and Swiss Target Prediction databases. The main targets of IPF were obtained through Gencards, Disgenet, OMIM, TTD, and DRUGBANK databases. The String platform was used to construct PPI networks. Cytoscape 3.8.2 was used to construct the "Danhong components - IPF targets-pathways" network. The molecular docking verification was conducted by Auto Dock.

RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were finally included with a total of 896 patients. The meta-analysis showed that Danhong injection could improve the clinical efficiency ([OR] = 0.25, 95% CI [0.15, 0.41]), lung function, arterial blood gas analysis, inflammatory cytokines, and serum cytokines associated with pulmonary fibrosis of IPF patients, respectively…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 896 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free