Evidence Hub

A Plant-Based Diet and Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease, and Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

Kim Y, Kim Y

Nutrients, 2026

846,589 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between a plant-based diet (PBD) and the incidence of total cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke in a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Methods: We searched the PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases up to February 2026 to identify prospective cohort studies assessing the association between a PBD and the incidence of total CVD, CHD, and stroke. Results: A total of twenty-two articles (nineteen cohort studies), including 846,589 subjects and 139,652 cases, were included in the meta-analysis. People with the highest adherence to overall PBD had a 10% lower risk of CVD than those with the lowest adherence (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). Adherence to a healthful plant-based diet (hPBD) was inversely associated with CVD risk (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.90), whereas adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet (uPBD) was positively associated with CVD risk (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24). High compliance with overall and a healthful PBD was associated with a 9% (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96) and 23% lower risk (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.72-0.84) of CHD development compared with low compliance, respectively. High compliance with a uPBD was associated with a 24% higher risk of CHD than low compliance. We found no significant association with stroke risk. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that a PBD was inversely associated with the risk of CVD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 846,589 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free