Evidence Hub

The anti-inflammatory effects of Citrus hystrix DC.: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies

Buakaew W, Thongsri Y, Mahikul W, Usuwanthim K

Scientific reports, 2026

7 participants

Abstract

Citrus hystrix DC., commonly known as kaffir lime, has been widely used in traditional medicine for its potential anti-inflammatory properties. However, evidence from experimental studies remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize existing in vitro and in vivo evidence on the anti-inflammatory effects of C. hystrix and its bioactive compounds. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched up to May 27, 2025, for experimental studies evaluating the anti-inflammatory activity of C. hystrix extracts or compounds in vitro or in vivo. Data on inflammatory biomarkers included nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and the inhibition of bovine serum albumin (BSA) denaturation were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. A total of 1,049 records were identified, of which 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies comprised both in vitro (n = 7) and in vivo (n = 2) experiments. The systematic review demonstrated that C. hystrix significantly reduced NO production, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels (p 80%) was observed, which was likely attributable to variations in experimental models, extract types, and dosages used across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis provided quantitative evidence supporting the anti-inflammatory potential of C. hystrix. The findings highlighted its role in suppressing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free