Evidence Hub

Dosage exploration of the effects of honey and its derivatives on cardiometabolic outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews and GRADE-assessed updated meta-analysis

Norouzzadeh M, Barazandeh S, Hasan Rashedi M, Jamshidi S, Hatamifar F, Maghsoomi Z, Teymoori F, Malek M

Nutrition & diabetes, 2025

3,544 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes are associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and economic burden, highlighting the need for alternative preventive strategies. Honey bee products, including honey, royal jelly, and propolis, are considered potential interventions for managing cardiometabolic risk factors. This umbrella review aimed to compare the effectiveness of these products in cardiometabolic health. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception through 21ST October 2024 to identify eligible meta-analyses and primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Random-effect pairwise analysis combined trial findings, while dose-response and influence analyses assessed result robustness. Evidence quality and certainty were evaluated using AMSTAR-II, ROB, GRADE, and ICEMAN criteria. Analysis of 69 RCTs with 3544 participants revealed that 10 g of honey daily may lower Hemoglobin A1C but adversely affect systolic blood pressure, Aspartate transferase, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein. Royal jelly improved blood pressure, lipid profiles, glycemic indices, and total antioxidant capacity. Propolis demonstrated reductions in anthropometric measures and improvements in lipid profile, glycemic control, liver enzymes, and inflammation and oxidative stress markers. While long-term or high-dose honey consumption in individuals with health concerns warrants caution, RJ and propolis demonstrated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,544 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free