Evidence Hub

Genome-wide analysis of heart failure yields insights into disease heterogeneity and enables prognostic prediction in the Japanese population

Enzan N, Miyazawa K, Koyama S, Kurosawa R, Ieki H, Yoshida H, Takechi F, Fukuyama M et al.

Nature communications, 2025

213,828 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

To understand the genetic basis of heart failure (HF) in the Japanese population, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) comprising 16,251 all-cause HF cases, 4254 HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) cases, 7154 HF with preserved ejection fraction cases, and 11,122 non-ischemic HF cases among 213,828 individuals and identified five novel loci. A subsequent cross-ancestry meta-analysis and multi-trait analysis of the GWAS data identified 19 novel loci in total, with 31 out of the 76 genome-wide significant loci associated with HFrEF despite its smaller sample size. Among these susceptibility loci, a common non-coding variant in TTN (rs1484116) was associated with reduced cardiac function and worse long-term mortality. We leveraged the HF meta-GWASs along with cardiac function-related GWASs to develop a polygenic risk score (PRS) for HF. The PRS successfully identified early-onset HF and those with an increased risk of long-term HF mortality. Our results shed light on the shared and distinct genetic basis of HF between Japanese and European populations and improve the clinical value of HF genetics.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 213,828 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free