Evidence Hub

Discussion on the mechanism of Danggui Sini decoction in treating diabetic foot based on network pharmacology and molecular docking and verification of the curative effect by meta-analysis

Ni X, Bao H, Guo J, Li D, Wang L, Zhang W, Sun G

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024

9 citations

Abstract

Objective: The main active components and mechanism of Danggui Sini decoction (DSD) in treating diabetic foot (DF) were studied and verified by network pharmacology and molecular docking. Evidence-based medicine was used to prove its efficacy.

Methods: The TCMSP systematic pharmacology platform screened out DSD's practical components and targets-screening disease targets in GeneCards database, using Cytoscape 3.7.2 to draw DSD-active ingredient-target network diagram, and drawing the protein interaction network diagram through STRING database. The Metascape platform was used to analyze the GO function enrichment and KEGG signal pathway. The molecular docking experiment was carried out by using Auto Dock vina 4.2. The related literature on DSD in treating DF in China Zhiwang, Wanfang, Weipu, and China Biomedical Literature Database was searched. The literature was screened, data was extracted, and quality was evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: A total of 256 targets of all effective components of DSD were obtained. Among 1,272 disease targets, there are 113 common targets. The GO analysis received 6,179 entries, and the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis found 251 related pathways. The molecular docking results of the main targets of diabetic foot and the active substances of DSD all showed a high docking activity. The meta-analysis included six literature, all of which were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free