Evidence Hub

The potential value of quercetin for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of preclinical studies

XiuCheng Duan, Liyuan Zhang, Fenye Liu

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quercetin, a ubiquitous natural flavonoid present in numerous medicinal plants and foods, has been widely recognized for its various bioactive properties. However, despite its potential, the preclinical animal studies evaluating its therapeutic efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain inadequate, and the existing clinical research in this area is still limited in quantity. These deficiencies hinder the practical application of quercetin in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Our comprehensive review involved systematically searching major databases-including PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase-up to April 2025 for relevant preclinical studies. The SYRCLE risk of bias tool was employed by researchers to evaluate each entry. Subsequently, data analysis was conducted using the statistical software Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS: The results of our meta-analysis showed that quercetin treatment not only significantly reduced the incidence of CRC (SMD-1.22, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.38, p = 0.004), but also alleviated inflammation and oxidative stress compared with the control group. Quercetin treatment effectively improved the degree of crypt lesions (SMD-1.40, 95%CI: -2.53 to -0.26, p = 0.02) and alleviated precancerous lesions in the animal model of CRC. In terms of tumor cell proliferation, quercetin had a significant inhibitory effect on cell proliferation during treatment, as determined by PCNA analysis (SMD -8.22, 95% CI: -10.48 to -5.95, p < 0.00001). Quercetin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free