Evidence Hub

Therapeutic efficacy of quercetin in experimental pulmonary fibrosis: A meta-analysis

Lanhua Cai, Long Chen, Chunmei Lin

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a fatal chronic disease characterized by progressive interstitial scarring, alveolar destruction and a persistent decline in lung function. The present study evaluated the therapeutic effects of quercetin, a natural flavonoid with potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, in animal models of PF (PROSPERO registration no. INPLASY202530122). A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and Ovid from inception to January 2025, identifying 25 eligible preclinical studies. Data were extracted and analyzed for outcomes in three main categories: Fibrotic changes, inflammatory responses and oxidative stress parameters. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed, followed by meta-regression analysis to examine study heterogeneity. The analysis indicated that quercetin administration was associated with improvements in fibrotic indicators, showing reduced collagen deposition and improved histopathological scores. Anti-inflammatory effects were observed through modulation of cytokine levels and inflammatory cell infiltration. Additionally, quercetin demonstrated effects on oxidative stress markers, showing enhanced antioxidant capacity and reduced oxidative damage. Meta-regression analysis identified a number of moderating factors, including dosage, treatment duration, animal model selection and induction method, which contributed to heterogeneity across studies. The findings suggest that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free