Evidence Hub

Quercetin supplementation and muscular atrophy in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Weiqun Lin, Yong-Yi Zhao, Cui-Zhen Liu, Yinghua Yan, Qiaowen Ou

International Journal of Food Properties, 2022

6 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Muscle atrophy is a degenerative condition characterized by secondary inflammation, free radical injury, and metabolic dysregulation. Evidence regarding the effects of quercetin on skeletal muscle atrophy is currently controversial and unclear. We hypothesized that quercetin, a anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties phytochemical, may play an important role in muscle atrophy, and we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effects of quercetin supplementation on muscular atrophy based on studies performed in animal models. Three atrophy biomarkers (muscle mass, fiber size, and function) with enough eligible studies (n = 6, 7, and 4, respectively) were combined in the final meta-analysis. Next, we calculated the overall and stratified effects of quercetin administration on muscular atrophy. No significant effects were observed on muscle mass and muscle function; however, we observed protective effects of quercetin on muscle fiber diameter and area [(Standardized Mean Difference (SMD): 0.82, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 1.28), and (SMD: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.62), respectively]. This study suggests that quercetin could have histological protection effect on muscle fiber. Thus, it could become a promising complementary therapy for muscle atrophy that occurs due to various clinical conditions. Abbreviations: SMD, Standardized Mean Difference; CI, Confidence interval; PRISMA-P, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free