Evidence Hub

Systematic review on anticancer potential of Kaempferol and quercetin against lung, breast, and colorectal cancers with emphasis on in vitro and in vivo studies

Bisma Shahid, Muhammad Tauseef Sultan, A. Noman, T. F. Yehuala, Irum Nafees, M. Maaz, Aroob Fatima, Adnan Amjad et al.

Discover Oncology, 2026

Abstract

Plant-based bioactive compounds, particularly kaempferol and quercetin, exhibit notable anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential. This systematic review evaluates experimental evidence on the effects of kaempferol and quercetin, in pure and isolated forms, against lung, breast, and colorectal cancers using in vitro and in vivo models. A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley Online Library was conducted in October 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating pure kaempferol or quercetin in human-derived cancer cell lines and animal models were included, while clinical and combination studies were excluded. Only quercetin-based in vivo studies met eligibility criteria. Out of 377 identified records, 24 studies were included. Both compounds consistently reduced cancer cell viability, induced apoptosis. They inhibited proliferation and migration by modulating the PI3K/Akt, MAPK, NF-κB, and p53 pathways across breast, lung, and colorectal cancer cell lines. Among the included studies, 16 were in vitro, and 8 were in vivo, with predominantly low risk of bias, indicating robust methodological quality. Overall, kaempferol and quercetin demonstrate strong anticancer activity in preclinical models, highlighting their promise for cancer prevention and management. However, well-designed clinical trials are needed to confirm their potential therapeutic relevance.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal and cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free