Evidence Hub

Impact of quercetin in patients with myocardial infarction. A multicenter, randomized, and open-label pilot study

S. Kozhukhov, P. Alexander, Y. Lutay, N. Dovganych, A. Parkhomenko, Y. Lutay, A. Stepura, S. Kozhukhov et al.

Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese, 2024

143 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading causes of death in the world. Early myocardial reperfusion improves acute MI survival. Bioflavonoid quercetin is known to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-proliferative properties. The presented pilot study aims to investigate the cardioprotective effect of quercetin on infarct size limiting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS: Patients (n = 143) with first anterior STEMI within 6 hours from symptoms onset were included in this open-label multicenter pilot study. Patients were randomized either into quercetin group (n = 70) in addition to standard treatment or recommended therapy alone group (control group, n = 73). Quercetin infusions were initiated before reperfusion and repeated during the next 5 days. The infarct size assessed using creatine kinase-myocardial band area under curve (CK-MB AUC) was the primary study outcome.

RESULTS: The study arms did not differ in demographics, time to admission, and main clinical data. The median early CK-MB AUC was significantly lower in quercetin group than in controls (8036 ± 7594 vs 11219 ± 8146 U × 1 h/L, p = 0.015). Intravenous quercetin administration was associated with less reperfusion-induced intramyocardial hemorrhage by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance on Day 3 (11.1% of patients in quercetin group vs 53.3% of patients in control group, p < 0.024). There were no significant differences in left ventricle ejection…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 143 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free