Evidence Hub

Efficacy of a bioflavonoid-enriched herbal versus 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes in reducing peri-implant inflammation and subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis carriage in patients with peri-implantitis

Alamry N, Aloumi DE, Alghamdi SS, Mohammed AE, Subhi ALHarthi S, BinShabaib MS, Aabed K, Basuhail S

Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2025

67 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: This study compared the efficacy of a bioflavonoid-enriched herbal mouthwash versus 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) in reducing peri-implant inflammation and subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) carriage among patients with peri-implantitis.

Methods: In all, 67 individuals diagnosed with peri-implantitis were enrolled. Demographic and implant-related data were retrieved, and subgingival biofilm samples were analysed for P. gingivalis. All patients underwent non-surgical mechanical debridement (MD) and were then randomised into three groups: test group (bioflavonoid mouthwash, n = 22), control group 1 (0.12% CHX, n = 23), and control group 2 (0.2% CHX, n = 22). Participants rinsed with 15 ml of the assigned solution twice daily for 90 days. Clinical parameters, including modified plaque index (mPI), modified bleeding index (mBI), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss, were recorded at baseline and after 90 days. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Significant reductions in mPI, mBI, and PD were observed across all groups compared with baseline (P < 0.05). The follow-up scores for these parameters were significantly lower in the test group compared with both CHX groups (P < 0.05). At baseline, P. gingivalis was detected in 79.1% of participants. After 90 days, P. gingivalis carriage was lower in the test group (13.6%) compared with control group 1 (50.0%) and control group 2 (54.5%).

Conclusion: Prescription of a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free