Evidence Hub

Impact of a Dietary Supplementation with French Maritime Pine Bark Extract Pycnogenol® on Salivary and Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers During Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy-A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Trial

Bayer J, Petersen NK, Hess JV, Jockel-Schneider Y, Högger P

Nutrients, 2025

91 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Gingival inflammation is highly prevalent and may impact systemic health. While professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) is the standard treatment, dietary interventions may provide additional benefits. The French maritime pine bark extract Pycnogenol® has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, but its impact on inflammatory biomarkers in saliva and serum has not been studied in a controlled clinical trial. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 91 participants received Pycnogenol® (100 mg twice daily; n = 46) or a placebo (n = 45) following PMPR. Saliva and serum samples were collected at baseline, and after two and three months. Inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β, IL-6, MMP-8, and MMP-9) and polyphenol concentrations were analyzed using ELISA and LC-MS/MS. Results: Pycnogenol® supplementation significantly reduced salivary MMP-8 levels (p = 0.0261), and serum IL-6 levels compared to placebo (p = 0.0409). Additionally, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and the gut microbial metabolite 5-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone (M1) significantly increased in saliva following Pycnogenol® intake. A correlation analysis revealed a significant inverse association between bleeding on probing and M1 concentration in saliva (r = -0.3476, p = 0.0167). Conclusions: Dietary supplementation with Pycnogenol® significantly reduced key inflammatory biomarkers and increased polyphenol concentrations in saliva, suggesting a potential…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 91 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free