Evidence Hub

Treatment of COVID-19 Patients with Quercetin: A Prospective, Single - Centre, Randomized, Controlled Trial

H. Onal, Bengu Arslan, Nurcan Ucuncu Ergun, Ş. Topuz, S. Y. Semerci, M. Kurnaz, Yulet Bolu, M. Bozkurt et al.

2021

447 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Aim The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of quercetin in

COVID-19 treatment. Methods This was a single-centre, prospective

randomised controlled cohort study. Routine care versus QCB (quercetin,

vitamin C, bromelain) supplementation was compared between 447 patients

with at least one chronic disease and moderate-to-severe respiratory

symptoms. Demographic features, signs, laboratory results and drug

administration data of patients were recorded. The endpoint was that QCB

supplementation was continued throughout the follow-up period from study

baseline to discharge, intubation, or death. Results The most common

complaints at presentation were fatigue (62.4%), cough (61.1%),

anorexia (57%), thirst (53.7%), respiratory distress (51%) and chills

(48.3%). The decrease in CRP, procalcitonin and ferritin levels was

higher in the QCB group (all Ps were <0.05). In the QCB group,

an increase in platelet and lymphocyte counts were higher (all Ps were

<0.05). QCB did not reduce the risk of events during

follow-up. Adjustments for statistically significant parameters,

including the lung stage, use of favipiravir and presence of comorbidity

did not change the results. While there was no difference between the

groups in terms of event frequency, QCB group had more advanced

pulmonary findings. QCB supplement is shown to have a positive effect on

laboratory recovery. Conclusion We suggest that suboptimal

bioavailability of QCB may explain this. So, we conclude that if a

stable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 447 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free