Evidence Hub

Use of antibiotics for prevention and treatment of sinus lift infections: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Díaz L, Ivanković M, Urrutia P, Uriarte X, Olivares M, Torres A, Fan S, Fernández E

BMC oral health, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use in sinus floor elevation (SFE) procedures remains controversial due to heterogeneous protocols and inconsistent clinical outcomes. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of systemic antibiotic regimens for the prevention and management of infections associated with SFE procedures, based on a synthesis of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. METHODS: The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD420251061400). Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2008–2024) were included. Methodological quality was appraised using AMSTAR-2, overlap among primary studies was evaluated with the GROOVE tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed through the GRADE approach. A descriptive synthesis was performed, as methodological heterogeneity and overlap precluded meta-analytic pooling. RESULTS: Infection rates following SFE ranged from 0.3% to 11.6%, with implant survival consistently above 90% regardless of antibiotic regimen. Prophylactic antibiotics were commonly prescribed (Amoxicillin or Amoxicillin/Clavulanate, 7–10 days), although no standardized protocol was identified. Reviews rated as high or moderate quality provided limited yet consistent evidence suggesting that antibiotics may reduce infection risk in high-risk situations (e.g., membrane perforation, extensive lateral approach, or systemic comorbidities). The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis may be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free