Evidence Hub

Quercetin ameliorates SIRT1-mediated oxidative stress and inflammation to attenuate ciliary muscle remodeling in experimental myopia

Yuan-Ting Yang, Miao Zhang, Rui-Xue Zhang, Meng-Ke Wu, Jiawen Hao, Zhong-Yu Ma, Zhaohui Yang, Yinqiao Zhang et al.

Biochemical Pharmacology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of quercetin in myopic ciliary muscle remodeling through the regulation of SIRT1 expression. To this end, a randomized controlled trial was conducted using negative lens-induced myopic (LIM) guinea pig models for durations of 4 weeks and 6 weeks, with subjects administered quercetin (QUE) or SRT1720. Changes in axial lengths and refractive errors were measured at 4 and 6 weeks. Subsequently, protein expression (e.g., SIRT1, KEAP1, NRF2, MMP-2, and TIMP-2) in ciliary muscles was analyzed by Western blotting, while the expression of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) was quantified via ELISA, and ciliary muscle morphologies were assessed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Calcium fluxes, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and mitochondrial membrane potentials (ΔΨm) were measured via noninvasive microtests and flow cytometry. Compared with the LIM group, the QUE and SIRT1 activator (SRT1720) intervention groups presented significantly reduced axial elongation amounts and refractive errors (P < 0.01), along with thickened ciliary muscles and improved fiber alignments. Additionally, the calcium influx and ROS levels were significantly reduced, and the ΔΨm levels were partially restored. Furthermore, Western blotting revealed upregulated SIRT1, NRF2, and TIMP-2 expression but downregulated KEAP1 and MMP-2 expression in the intervention groups, and ELISA revealed decreased…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free