Evidence Hub

Comparative Evaluation of Three Cranberry Formulations in Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: An Observational Study

Guillemet D, Juhel C, Rigaudier F, Herpin F, Meudec E

Research and reports in urology, 2026

219 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Although cranberry supplementation has been investigated for recurrent UTI prevention with heterogeneous demonstrations, direct comparisons of putative active compositions remain scarce. The present study aimed to compare three cranberry formulations differing in composition and PACs (Proanthocyanidins) profiles on recurrent UTI episodes, urinary symptoms and quality of life in women with recurrent UTIs.

Patients and methods: Three extracts differing in the sources of their fruits, extraction process, solubility, and composition were characterized (40SD, 40G, and FG). A total of 219 women aged 18 to 65 years with recurrent UTI episodes were enrolled in an observational, comparative, open-label, parallel clinical study and allocated to receive one of three treatments for 6 months. Posology was standardized to provide equivalent amounts of PACs, and endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 6 months.

Results: Extract characterization differed notably for organic acids, fibre, monomeric phenolic compounds, soluble and oligomeric forms of PACs, and the degree of polymerization. All three extracts significantly improved urinary comfort (VAS, 53.8 ± 16.2 → 80.9 ± 25.6; p < 0.001), symptomatic episodes (frequency: 2.9 → 0.8; p < 0.001; duration: 2.7 → 0.7 days; p < 0.001), global symptom intensity assessed using the ACSS, global quality of life assessed using the SF-Qualiveen, and psychosocial impact questionnaire scores, with no significant differences between groups.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 219 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free