Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of TiaoPi AnChang decoction to reduce CAPOX-Induced adverse reactions in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Zhang J, Guo Y, Hua Z, Liu M, Fu T, Ning W, Zhou L, Tang T et al.

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026

496 participants

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy of TiaoPi AnChang Decoction (TPACD) against CAPOX-induced adverse reactions (CIARs) and improving survival outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy. This paper presents an interim analysis of the clinical trial, with a primary focus on CIARs.

Patients and methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling high-risk stage II or III CRC patients undergoing CAPOX who were diagnosed with spleen-kidney deficiency syndrome. The study planned to randomly assign 98 patients in a 1:1 ratio to either the TPACD group (30 mL orally, twice daily) or the placebo group (matched placebo). The trial duration spanned 4 chemotherapy cycles (approximately 84 days), during which we assessed the incidence of CIARs (graded via CTCAE), Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome scores, quality of life (QoL, evaluated via EORTC QLQ-C30), peripheral blood immune cell subsets, tumor markers, safety, and survival outcomes. A linear mixed-effects model was applied to adjust for baseline differences.

Results: Among 496 screened CRC patients, 108 were randomized into the TPACD group (n = 54) or the placebo group (n = 54). The incidence of overall CIARs was significantly lower in the TPACD group (P = 0.009), particularly for grade ≥2 CIARs (37.77% vs. 67.70%, P = 0.008). Subgroup analyses revealed that the treatment effect was homogeneous, with no significant interaction observed between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 496 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free