Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of supplementation of Exclzyme Pet for the management of arthritis and inflammatory symptoms in dogs: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial

Wangikar PB, Deshpande AR, Arja A, Natu KV, Magdum RR

Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026

12 participants

Abstract

Background: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled interventional pilot trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Exclzyme Pet in alleviating clinical symptoms associated with canine arthritis.

Methods: A total of 26 client-owned dogs exhibiting clinical signs of arthritis were enrolled in a 30-day pilot trial, of which 23 completed the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the treatment group (N = 12), receiving Exclzyme Pet (2 g per dog, administered orally twice daily on an empty stomach with water), or the placebo group (N = 11), receiving maltodextrin at an equivalent dose.

Results: Exclzyme Pet resulted in a statistically significant reduction in scores for lameness, weight bearing, joint mobility, willingness to hold up contralateral limb, and pain by 51.96, 46.94, 48.94, 58.0, and 55.56%, respectively and demonstrated clear superiority over placebo. The overall quality of life, mood, and mobility improved significantly in the treatment group over the placebo. Serum C-reactive protein levels decreased markedly by 56.10% in dogs receiving Exclzyme Pet, whereas levels increased by 15.38% in the placebo group, indicating a strong anti-inflammatory effect (p < 0.001). No adverse hematological findings or clinical events were reported, and the supplement was well tolerated, without gastrointestinal or systemic complications.

Conclusion: In conclusion, Exclzyme Pet demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing clinical signs of arthritis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free