Evidence Hub

Ningmitai capsule in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel, positive-controlled study

Gao J, Zhang Y, Du J, Liu Q, Cheng Y, Yang W, Wang D, Wang W et al.

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025

323 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: CP/CPPS is characterized by pain, the primary symptom, which significantly affects QoL and disrupts lower urinary tract function. Conventional monotherapies are often ineffective, necessitating multimodal treatments targeting key symptoms.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel, positive-controlled trial enrolled 323 men aged 18-60 years with CP/CPPS across 14 centers in China. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: tamsulosin 0.2 mg daily, Ningmitai capsule (NMT) 1.52 g thrice daily, or a combination of both, for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the total NIH-CPSI score from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in pain, urinary, QoL subdomains, the percentage of patients achieving a ≥25% reduction in NIH-CPSI total score, and pain scores. Safety was monitored through adverse events and liver function tests.

Results: Of the 323 patients, 108 received tamsulosin, 109 NMT, and 106 combination therapy. After 8 weeks, both NMT and combination therapy demonstrated significantly greater reductions in total NIH-CPSI scores compared to tamsulosin (-11.44 vs. -8.58, P P P = 0.001) and improved QoL (P P P P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that NMT was most effective in patients with mild to moderate CP/CPPS, younger age (18-34 years), and disease duration of <12 months. No serious adverse events occurred, and NMT was well-tolerated across all groups.

Conclusion: NMT demonstrated superior efficacy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 323 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free