Evidence Hub

Real world use of dalbavancin for bone and joint infections: a retrospective case series in adults and children

Ajapuje PS, Sameel S, Gaikwad D, Kumar PS, Dharangutti R

BMC research notes, 2026

14 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone and joint infections (BJIs) often require prolonged parenteral therapy, with challenges of hospitalization and vascular access [1–4]. Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, enables once-weekly dosing [7–10]. This study reports real-world outcomes of dalbavancin, used off-label in adults and children with BJIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre case series of 14 consecutive patients (10 adults, 4 paediatric) with Gram-positive BJIs treated between January 2024 and April 2025. All received ≥ 3 weekly dalbavancin doses (definitive therapy), with oral step-down to complete a total treatment course of 8–12 weeks. Demographics, microbiology, therapy and outcomes were assessed with ≥ 6 months follow-up. MICs were tested using E-test strips; results interpreted using CLSI 2021 breakpoints [12]. Off-label nature of therapy was noted. RESULTS: Median age was 36 years (range 5–80), including 4 paediatric patients. MRSA accounted for 57% of the isolates. Dalbavancin MICs were consistently low (≤ 0.064 mg/L) [12, 14]. Median prior antibiotic exposure was 10 days before switch over to dalbavancin. All patients achieved end-of-therapy cure defined as the resolution of signs and symptoms of infection with no requirement for additional antibiotics for the primary infection and no recurrence. At 6 months, 92.9% patients remained infection-free while one patient who was still under follow up, showed sustained clinical improvement. Therapy was well…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free