Evidence Hub

Insights into the clinical presentation, imaging, and management of infiltrative keratitis following accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking

Bari A, Sushma N, Agarwal T, Shakkarwal C, Maharana PK, Dada T, Sharma N

Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the risk factors, clinical features, visual outcomes, and in-vivo imaging characteristics in cases of keratoconus developing keratitis following accelerated collagen cross-linking (CXL).

Methods: A retrospective observational case series at a tertiary eye center in India evaluating eyes that underwent accelerated CXL from January 2021 to July 2024.

Results: Of 723 eyes undergoing CXL, 14 eyes developed infiltrative keratitis (1.93%). The majority belonged to the upper middle socioeconomic class and presented in summer and rainy seasons. The relative risk of developing infiltrates in cases ≤16 years was 2.38, and in cases with history of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, it was 0.7. The median area of epithelial defect was 12 mm 2 , and the average resolution time was 18.4 ± 12.9 days. The most common organism that was isolated was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. The majority of the cases on anterior segment optical coherence tomography showed involvement anterior to the demarcation line. Scheimpflug imaging showed three keratometric patterns: flattening and thinning, flattening and thinning with transient steepening, and minimal to no change.

Conclusion: Infiltrative keratitis following accelerated CXL is a rare clinical entity. Early presentation and timely management including use of topical steroids are associated with good visual outcomes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free