Evidence Hub

Acute Ingestion of a Mixed Flavonoid and Caffeine Supplement Increases Energy Expenditure and Fat Oxidation in Adult Women: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial (OR29-07-19)

D. Nieman, M. Kohlmeier, Andrew J Simonson, W. Sha, C. Sakaguchi, Tondra Blevins, Jaina Hattabaugh

Current Developments in Nutrition, 2019

19 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objectives

This randomized, double-blinded, crossover study measured the acute effect of ingesting a mixed flavonoid-caffeine (MFC) supplement compared to placebo (PL) on energy expenditure (EE) and fat oxidation (FATox) in a metabolic chamber with pre-menopausal women (N = 19, mean ± SD, age 30.7 ± 8.0 y, BMI 25.7 ± 3.4 kg/m2).

Methods

The MFC supplement (678 mg flavonoids, split dose 8:30 am, 1:00 pm) contained quercetin (200 mg), green tea catechins (368 mg, 180 mg EGCG), and anthocyanins (128 mg) from bilberry extract, and 214 mg caffeine. Participants were measured twice in a metabolic chamber for a day, 4 weeks apart, with primary outcomes including EE for 5 defined time segments and 22 h (22hEE, 8:30-6:30 am), substrate utilization from the respiratory quotient (RQ), physical activity counts, and plasma caffeine levels (4:00 pm). Areas under the curve (AUC) for metabolic data from the MFC and PL trials were calculated for 5 time segments using the trapezoid rule, with a mixed linear model (GLM) used to evaluate the overall treatment effect, and paired t-tests used to compare data for each time segment.

Results

EE and oxygen consumption for the MFC trial were significantly higher than PL (p < 0.001) when AUCs were compared as a whole and for each defined segment except during sleep. 22hEE with MFC was significantly higher than PL (1582 ± 143, 1535 ± 154 kcal/d, respectively, P = 0.003), with an average trial difference of 46.4 ± 57.8 kcal/d. Activity counts were not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free