Evidence Hub

Dietary quercetin intake is associated with lower ulcerative colitis risk but not Crohn's disease in a prospective cohort study and in vivo experiments

Lu SY, Dan L, Sun S, Fu T, Chen J

Food & function, 2024

20 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Previous preclinical evidence indicates a protective role of quercetin against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is no evidence from human populations, resulting in knowledge gaps regarding the role of quercetin in the IBD development. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the associations between dietary quercetin intake and IBD in humans and in vivo animal models. Methods: We included 187 709 IBD-free participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary information was collected using validated 24-hour dietary recalls and the quercetin intake was estimated based on national nutrient databases. Incident IBD was ascertained via inpatient and primary care data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the multi-variable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Experiments were conducted in two chemical-induced (dextran sulfate sodium salt and trinitro-benzene-sulfonic acid) mouse models orally pretreated with quercetin (CAS number: 117-39-5) solution to evaluate the effects of quercetin at physiological levels. Results: After a mean follow-up of 9.7 years, we documented 863 incident IBD. Compared to participants with the lowest quintile intake of quercetin, those in the highest quintiles were associated with a lower risk of IBD (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.95; P-trend = 0.004) and ulcerative colitis (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.91; P-trend = 0.001), but not Crohn's disease (aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.62-1.45; P-trend = 0.765). Mouse models…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free