Evidence Hub

Higher Dietary Quercetin Intake Is Associated with Lower Risk of Adverse Outcomes among Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Prospective Cohort Study

Wang T, Lu SY, Dan L, Sun Y, Fu T, Tian L, Chen J

The Journal of nutrition, 2024

2,293 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cumulative preclinical evidence reported quercetin, a major flavonoid, can attenuate the disease activity of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, there is limited evidence that supports the benefits of quercetin for patients with IBD.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether dietary quercetin intake is associated with adverse outcomes among individuals with IBD in a prospective cohort study.

METHODS: We included 2293 participants with IBD (764 Crohn's disease [CD] and 1529 ulcerative colitis [UC]) from the UK Biobank. Dietary information was collected using validated 24-h dietary assessments, and quercetin intake was estimated based on national nutrient databases. Two outcomes, enterotomy and all-cause mortality, were obtained based on the national data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: After a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 9.6 (1.8) y, we documented 193 enterotomy events and 176 deaths. Compared with participants with the lowest quartile intake of quercetin, those in the highest quartiles were associated with lower risk of enterotomy (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.76) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.83) in IBD. The inverse associations between quercetin and enterotomy were consistent in CD (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.78) but not UC (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.07), while the inverse associations between quercetin and mortality were consistent both in CD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,293 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free