Evidence Hub

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various intensive care algorithms and their impact on cerebral complications in elderly patients with burn injuries and clinical sirs

O. Bondarenko, P. A. Kyiko

Kharkiv Surgical School, 2025

60 participants

Abstract

Abstract. Оbjective: to compare three approaches to intensive care in patients aged ≥65 years with burn injuries and SIRS and their impact on the frequency of cerebral complications.

Materials and methods. A prospective cohort clinical randomized open-label study was conducted for 60 patients aged 65–85 years with II–III degree thermal burns. All had clinically confirmed SIRS. Patients were randomized into three groups: group I – intensive care was provided according to the local protocol, group II – L-arginine hydrochloride solution was added to the local protocol, and group III – corvitin solution, a complex of quercetin and povidone, was added to the local protocol. The incidence of delirium according to CAM, the incidence of seizures, and long-term consequences—long-term cognitive impairment and acute stroke—were determined.

Results: There was a twofold decrease in the number of patients with delirium according to CAM in group III compared to group I, and a 30% decrease in group II compared to group I. The same trend was observed when assessing the incidence of seizures in patients of all groups during hospitalization. Thirty days after discharge from the hospital, cognitive dysfunction was recorded in 48% of patients in group I, 28% in group II, and 16% in group III. No cases of acute stroke were recorded in any patients in groups I, II, and III within 30 days after discharge.

Conclusions. In elderly patients with burn trauma and clinical SIRS, the addition of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free