Evidence Hub

Personalised use of repurposed non-anticancer drugs in colorectal cancer based on up-regulated signalling pathways: A real world cohort feasibility study

Andrew Gaya, D. Patil, V. Datta, N. Srivastava, S. Apurwa, D. Akolkar, A. Shreenivas

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

391 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

833

Background:

Targeting signaling pathways in colorectal cancers is a common therapeutic strategy. In addition to targeted drugs, non- anticancer drugs approved for use in other health conditions can inhibit key pathways. De novo tumor transcriptome analysis can identify patient-specific up- and down-regulated transcripts, based on which the corresponding repurposed drugs can be used in synergistic combinations with standard of care (SoC) regimens.

Methods:

This retrospective study was conducted on a real-world cohort of 459 colorectal cancer cases (218 females, 241 males; median age 56 years) who had taken Exacta multi-omics tumor profiling for selection of personalized treatments. Transcriptome analysis was performed as part of the evaluations to determine up and down-regulated gene transcripts for selecting targeted, endocrine, and cytotoxic anticancer agents as well as non-anticancer (repurposed) drugs and phytochemicals that could be used for tandem targeting of the dysregulated signaling pathways, as indicated in the table below.

Results:

Transcriptome analysis of this cohort revealed dysregulation of ≥1 pathway in 391 patients (85.2%). MAPKs (n = 244, 53.2%) and MMPs (n = 210, 45.8%) were most frequently upregulated. Celecoxib (n = 292, 63.6%), Atorvastatin (n = 255, 55.6%), and Doxycycline (n = 208, 45.3%) were the most frequently indicated repurposed drugs for targeting the identified dysregulated pathways. Potential indications for ≥1 repurposed drugs were seen…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 391 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free