Evidence Hub

A retrospective multicenter case series of real-world tralokinumab use in dupilumab-experienced patients

Edward Herman, Jessica Burgy, Mona Shahriari

JAAD Case Reports, 2024

7 citations

Abstract

targeting the IL-13 cytokine and is a reasonable option for biologic na € ıve patients as well as patients who have tried and failed dupilumab. However, real-world evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab use in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were previously treated with dupilumab is limited. Approximately 4% to 14% of patients with AD experience treatment failure with dupilumab as a result of either worsening AD or AEs, including conjunctivitis. 12 Here, we report a retrospective multicenter case series of tralokinumab use in 9 dupilumab-experienced patients in the United States. These findings help to further characterize the efficacy and safety profile of tralokinumab

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free