Evidence Hub

Associations Between a Targeted Metabolomics Panel of Urinary Flavonoids and Flavonoid Intakes from Fruits and Vegetables Across Dietary Assessment Periods

E. Hill, A. Pashkova, E. Grainger, K. Roberts, C. Chitchumroonchokchai, S. Clinton, C. Spees

Current Developments in Nutrition, 2021

17 participants

Abstract

Aligning dietary intake and food composition data with biomarkers of exposure is critical for advancing assessment methodology. Flavonoids present in fruits and vegetables (FV) are rapidly metabolized and excreted in urine; therefore they may serve as acute intake biomarkers. Yet, the optimal dietary assessment period has not been determined. The objective of this study was to evaluate associations between a targeted metabolomics panel of six urinary flavonoids and dietary intakes of these flavonoids from FV across varying dietary assessment periods.

In this cross-sectional study, three-day diet records from 17 individuals were analyzed via Nutrition Data System for Research to determine FV intakes over one-day, two-day, and three-day assessment periods. Dietary flavonoids from FV were estimated via the Phenol-Explorer database; total intakes of targeted flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin, phloretin, naringenin, hesperetin) were calculated by summing aglycone and glycosylated forms. Twenty-four-hour (24-h) urine was collected on the final day of diet records. Urinary flavonoid aglycones were quantified using HPLC; total urinary flavonoids were calculated by summing targeted flavonoids. Spearman correlations between flavonoid intakes and urinary flavonoids were analyzed by dietary assessment period.

Mean targeted flavonoid intake from FV was 53.6 mg/day. Ten specific FV provided >95% of dietary flavonoids, with greatest contributions from citrus (orange juice,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free