Evidence Hub

Cellular Senescence of Lens Epithelial Cells and Age-Related Cataract: A Systematic Review

Kourtesa A, Skarentzos K, Dimtsas GS, Foukas PG, Moschos M

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

821 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Recent evidence links lens epithelial cell (LEC) dysfunction and cellular senescence-an irreversible cell cycle arrest with a pro-inflammatory secretory phenotype-to age-related cataract (ARC) progression. This systematic review synthesizes current knowledge on LEC senescence, its molecular features, and laboratory methods for senescence assessment in the ARC. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases retrieved 3417 records from inception to 9 February 2025, with 14 studies ultimately included (821 patients and multiple in vitro LEC models). The following multiple senescence expression pathways were identified: SA-β-gal activity, p53/p21 and p16INK4A pathway activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and secretion of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors. Notably, cortical cataract demonstrated direct association with local senescent cell accumulation, while nuclear cataract reflected cumulative oxidative damage from impaired LEC-mediated antioxidant defense. Senescence markers correlated positively with cataract severity across multiple studies. Several potential therapeutic targets emerged, including metformin (AMPK activation/autophagic restoration), circMRE11A silencing, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition, and modulation of FYCO1/PAK1 and MMP2 pathways. This review establishes LEC senescence as a central process in ARC pathogenesis and highlights promising senotherapeutic approaches. Future…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 821 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free