Evidence Hub

Tailoring antitubercular therapy in a critically ill patient with abdominal tuberculosis

Hariharan R, Basheer H, Kandaswamy N, S JA, Toi PC

BMJ case reports, 2026

Abstract

Abdominal tuberculosis may present acutely as peritonitis or intestinal perforation, which might need immediate surgical intervention and postoperative intensive care. Even in rifampicin-sensitive tuberculosis, standard first-line oral antitubercular therapy might be ineffective due to the unreliable gastrointestinal absorption and altered pharmacokinetics. We report a case of a young woman with abdominal tuberculosis and multiple ileal perforations who required intensive care following emergency laparotomy. We used an initial antitubercular treatment with the combination of intravenous amikacin, linezolid and levofloxacin until intestinal function recovered. She was then transitioned to standard oral therapy with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, achieving full recovery. This case highlights the value of short-term parenteral antitubercular regimens as a bridge in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal compromise, underscoring the role of pharmacokinetic considerations and multidisciplinary care.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free