Evidence Hub

Biochemical discordance of a urinary fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli ST1193 as a Shigella species: A case report

Peine B, Juan MRS, Choi H, Hwang M, Jinadatha C, Navarathna DH

IDCases, 2026

Abstract

Escherichia coli (E. coli) sequence type 1193 (ST1193) is an emerging pathogenic organism that is increasingly identified in urinary specimens and often demonstrates multi-drug resistance. Although ST1193 is a well-documented E. coli clone, its lactose-nonfermenting phenotype and other atypical biochemical features may complicate routine laboratory interpretation. We report a urinary isolate from a 38-year-old woman with asymptomatic bacteriuria and a history of recurrent urinary tract infections that was identified as E. coli by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and confirmed as E. coli ST1193 by whole-genome sequencing but was classified as Shigella group with 91% confidence by an automated biochemical identification panel. The isolate demonstrated delayed growth as pinpoint pale-tan colonies on CHROMagar, non-lactose fermentation on MacConkey agar, lysine decarboxylase positivity, and orange-yellow colony formation on Hektoen Enteric agar. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated resistance to ampicillin, some 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, with susceptibility to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, later-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems. This case highlights a practical diagnostic pitfall. E. coli ST1193 may be accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS and genomic methods yet still generate misleading biochemical-panel results suggestive of Shigella due to their similar genomic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free