Evidence Hub

Sino-Cranial Aspergillosis in an ABO-Incompatible Renal Transplant Recipient Following a "March of Infections"

Panda JP, Langote A, Nikte H, Jessani L, Rahmani S

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

We report the clinical management and pharmacologic challenges of sino‑cranial aspergillosis in a renal allograft recipient. A 60‑year‑old male patient underwent ABO‑incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation and, after a 15‑month "march of infections" that included multidrug‑resistant bacterial sepsis, rifamycin‑sparing antitubercular therapy, and new‑onset diabetes, presented with persistent unilateral headache. Four months earlier, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for frontal sinusitis had yielded maxillary debris that cultured Aspergillus fumigatus but was interpreted as colonization. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a left frontal pyocele with posterior frontal sinus table erosion and skull-base extension, and craniotomy specimens confirmed A. fumigatus on microscopy, histopathology, and culture. Surgical source control followed by systemic voriconazole (intravenous followed by oral), in the context of a high net state of immunosuppression, resulted in clinical improvement and radiologic resolution by 10 weeks with preserved graft function. Voriconazole therapy was complicated by a marked tacrolimus interaction that required major dose reduction and intensive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), with tacrolimus troughs normalizing by day 75. This case underscores that in immunosuppressed transplant recipients, sinus isolation of Aspergillus spp. should not be dismissed as benign colonization; even in the absence of unequivocal focal signs, it warrants…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free