Evidence Hub

Staged percutaneous management of multiple postoperative pyogenic liver abscesses following cholecystectomy in a patient with type 2 diabetes: a case report

Pulatov U, Matmurotov K, Bobabekov A, Yorkulov A, Khamdamov S, Semash K

International journal of surgery case reports, 2026

Abstract

Background: Pyogenic liver abscesses remain a serious postoperative complication, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The optimal staged, minimally invasive management of multiple postoperative abscesses remains challenging.

Case presentation: A 46-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus developed high-grade fever, intoxication, and right upper quadrant pain 2 weeks after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis complicated by cholangitis. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated anemia, neutrophilic leukocytosis, elevated bilirubin, and inflammatory markers. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT identified multiple liver abscesses, the largest measuring 10.4 × 9.1 cm.

Management and outcome: Given the patient's high operative risk, a staged minimally invasive strategy was chosen. Initial percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the largest abscess was performed under ultrasound guidance, yielding 250 mL of purulent material, followed by continuous irrigation. Microbiological culture identified Klebsiella pneumoniae, and targeted antimicrobial therapy was initiated. Persistent signs of intoxication prompted repeat imaging, which demonstrated a residual abscess in segments V-VI. A second percutaneous drainage procedure was performed. The patient showed rapid clinical and laboratory improvement after the second intervention and was discharged on day 9. Follow-up CT 1 month later demonstrated small, well-drained residual cavities without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free