Evidence Hub

Cerebellar syndrome associated with legionellosis: A case report and literature review

K. Diallo, M. Rivière, B. Gutierrez, F. Andry, A. Bertolotti, N. Zemali, C. S. Terrier, R. Manaquin et al.

La Revue de medecine interne, 2022

110 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Legionnaire's disease is a community-acquired pneumonia caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila. This disease is often associated with neurological symptoms, the clinical presentation of which can be very varied.

CASE REPORT

We report a 47-year-old female patient who developed Legionnaires' disease with cerebellar symptoms (ataxia, dysarthria and hypermetria). Laboratory tests revealed a biological inflammatory syndrome. The cerebrospinal fluid was sterile. Urinary antigen test and serology were positive for L. pneumophila. An interstitial syndrome of the right upper lobe was detected on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. Brain imaging (magnetic resonance imaging and CT angiography) showed no abnormalities. The outcome was favourable after treatment with spiramycin, levofloxacin and corticosteroids.

DISCUSSION

Few cases only (n=110) of Legionnaires' disease with cerebellar symptoms have been reported in the literature. The pathogenic mechanism behind neurological dysfunction in patients with Legionnaires' disease is unknown. Neurological symptoms improve with antibiotic therapy and corticosteroids. Extra-pulmonary forms of Legionnaires' disease are frequent, with neurological symptoms being the most common symptoms. Cerebellar dysfunction may be underestimated and requires appropriate management with antibiotic therapy and corticosteroid therapy. Recommendations for the management of Legionnaire's disease with severe extra-pulmonary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free