Evidence Hub

Clinical Presentation of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1-Associated Pneumonia and Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage: A Case Report and Literature Review

K. Ishikawa, Tomoaki Nakamura, Takahiro Matsuo, Fujimi Kawai, H. Murakami, Kotaro Aoki, Tatsuya Nagasawa, Yukie Uehara et al.

The American journal of case reports, 2022

2 citations

Abstract

Patient: Female, 44-year-old Final Diagnosis: Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1-associated pneumonia and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage Symptoms: Dyspnea Medication:— Clinical Procedure: Bronchoalveolar lavage Specialty: Infectious Diseases Objective: Rare disease Background: We report a case of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup (SG) 1 and review the existing literature to identify risk factors and determine the prognosis of patients with Legionella pneumonia-associated DAH. Case Report: A 44-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital following the presentation of dyspnea for a few days. Chest computed tomography (CT) findings revealed “crazy-paving” pattern in the right upper lobe implicating DAH and consolidation in the lower lobe. Analysis of the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid revealed DAH, with further analyses identifying L. pneumophila SG 1 as the causative agent. The patient was successfully treated with levofloxacin and a red blood cell transfusion and discharged on the 32nd day of hospitalization. A literature review of 6 reported cases (including our case) of Legionella pneumonia-associated DAH revealed that the median age of patients with DAH was 59 years (range, 44–75 years), involving female patients in 4 cases (67%) and the use of immunosuppressive drugs in 2 cases (33%). Three cases were BAL Legionella polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive and 4 cases were diagnosed using a urinary Legionella antigen test (one…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free