Evidence Hub

‘TAVR Infected Pseudomonas Endocarditis’: a case report

F. Essien, Shane B. Patterson, F. Estrada, T Scott Wall, J. Madden, Michael R. McGarvey

Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 2022

6 citations

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) rarely causes infective endocarditis (IE), previously reported for approximately 3% of all patients with IE.1 Most commonly, the infection occurs in intravenous drug users (IVDU) as right-sided endocarditis, noting presentations of P. aeruginosa IE without history of intravenous drug to be extremely rare, finding only a few cases reported in the literature. However there are increasing reports of cardiovascular implantable electronic device–related and prosthetic heart valve infections caused by this pathogen in non-IVDUs.2 This report will focus on the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of P. aeruginosa endocarditis in an 89-year-old patient with a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Medical management was pursued due to the patient’s underlying comorbidities. Long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy with delafloxacin was successful in maintaining negative blood cultures, despite an allergy to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Plain Language Summary An 89-year-old male was admitted to our hospital after he was diagnosed with a blood stream infection. The initial identification noted gram-negative organisms consistent with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa so the patient was started on intravenous (IV) antibiotics. He improved after the antibiotics started and was discharged to a nursing facility to complete his antibiotics course. While at the facility, after he had finished his antibiotics, he started to become ill again. He…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free