Evidence Hub

Early Stoppage Versus Continuation of Antimicrobial Therapy in Low Risk Pediatric Cancer Patients With Febrile Neutropenia, Before Recovery of Counts: a Randomized Controlled Study -DALFEN Study

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2018

142 participants

Abstract

Pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia coming to Department of Medical Oncology with low risk features (culture awaited), will be started on intravenous antibiotics (Inj Cefoperazone+ Sulbactam ± Amikacin) on outpatient basis. Those patients will be reassessed for randomization once they fulfill all inclusion criteria and get afebrile for at least 24 hours. Antibiotics will be stopped in Arm-A and oral antibiotics, in place of intravenous antibiotics, will be started in Arm-B. The patients will be followed-up till ANC≥ 500, or reappearance of fever within follow-up of ≤ 10 days.

Conditions: Neutropenia, Febrile, Pediatric Cancer.

Primary outcome: Treatment is considered to be successful if the following is attained without changing the regimen - Patient remains afebrile till recovery of ANC ≥500 •Measure of effect: Proportion of patients afebrile in each arm.

Enrollment: 142 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 142 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free