Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Lactobacillus-supplemented eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Moore KMH, Santo P, Holanda EU, Nau AL, Meine GC

European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026

4,010 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies supplemented with Lactobacillus spp. may improve eradication rates and reduce adverse events by modulating gut microbiota and immune responses. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus-supplemented Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with and without Lactobacillus in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to August 2026. The primary outcome was eradication success, and the secondary outcome was adverse events. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. We also estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) for eradication success and conducted subgroup analyses by antibiotic therapy type, duration of antibiotic treatment, Lactobacillus strain type, Lactobacillus dosage, period of Lactobacillus use, probiotic formulation, geographical region, and age range. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024611138).

Results: Thirty-two RCTs (4,010 patients) were included. Lactobacillus-supplemented eradication therapy improved eradication success (RR 1.10; 95%CI 1.05-1.14; NNT 13) and reduced the risk of adverse events (RR 0.70; 95%CI 0.58-0.84). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences in eradication success by antibiotic regimen and in adverse event risk by age group. Improved eradication…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,010 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free