Evidence Hub

Early discharge of hospitalised patients with community-acquired urosepsis when treated with levofloxacin in sequential therapy

Concia E, Marchetti F, LEVT07 Study Group

Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica, 2006

47 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sequential therapy with levofloxacin with a standard treatment in the management of urosepsis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a multicenter, randomized, open label, pilot trial in community acquired urosepsis carried out in 7 hospitals. Levofloxacin administered 500 mg twice a day intravenously and then orally was compared to piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g three times a day, both in combination with amikacin 7.5 mg/Kg twice a day, for a maximum of 14 days. Amikacin could be suspended between day 3-7.

RESULTS: Both treatments were efficacious and well tolerated in the 47 enrolled patients, even tough the time to clinical stability was shorter in the levofloxacin treated patients (3.9 vs. 4.9 days). In the levofloxacin group the sequential therapy was performed in 19 (82.6%) cases, after 4.8 +/- 1.7 days of parenteral administration (100% in the per-protocol population after 5.1 +/- 1.9 days).

CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the sequential therapy in the levofloxacin group allowed an early hospital discharge in patients with urosepsis and a cost saving in the hospital perspective.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 47 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free