Evidence Hub

Effect of medicinal treatment on epithelial wound healing after phacoemulsification

Tomilova EV, Nemsitsveridze MN, Panova IE

Vestnik oftalmologii, 2017

40 participants

Abstract

AIM: to compare the dynamics of epithelial wound healing under two different post-op treatments in patients after uncomplicated phacoemulsification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 40 eyes of 40 patients aged 66.4±8.2 years who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with flexible intraocular lens implantation through a 2.2-mm corneal incision. Patients were randomized to receive either dexamethasone 0.1% and diclofenac 0.1% (n=20 eyes, Group I), or bromfenac 0.09% (n=20 eyes, Group II). Also, all patients instilled levofloxacin 0.5%. The dynamics of epithelial wound healing was assessed with the RTVue-100 spectral domain optical coherence tomograph with CAM-L corneal module in the 3D CORNEA mode 2 hours after surgery and on days 1, 3, 5, and 10.

RESULTS: The postoperative period was uneventful in all cases. Two hours after surgery, epithelial defects were found in all eyes and their length did not differ statistically p=0.47. On the first day after surgery, complete epithelization was observed in 30% of cases from Group I and 60% of cases from Group II. The average length of epithelial defects was reliably smaller in Group II than in Group I (p=0.04 respectively). On postoperative day 3, 20% eyes from Group I still had epithelial defects with the average length of 0.45±0.13 mm, while there was only one eye with a 0.2-mm epithelial defect in Group II. Finally, on postoperative day 5, there was a single 0.3-mm epithelial defect in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free